By Charles Halton on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 at 10:16 pm

One of my goals for the International Biblical Studies Writing Month was to write a review of William Schniedewind and Joel Hunt’s A Primer on Ugaritic:

A Primer on Ugaritic

I’m happy to report that I finished the review and it is published in the Journal of Hebrew Scriptures accessible here.


Comments (6)

Category: All,Book Reviews,Ugaritic

6 Comments

Comment by Alan Lenzi

Made Wednesday, 16 of January , 2008 at 11:40 pm

Mazal Tov on the review!

Comment by Bill

Made Sunday, 20 of January , 2008 at 8:27 pm

Thanks for the review Charles. The “Primer” was the culmination of 10+ years of teaching Ugaritic by Joel and myself. If anyone catches any typos/corrections, please send them along to me. At some point, I plan to do a 2nd edition with corrections and updates.

Best regards,
Bill Schniedewind

Pingback by biblicalia » Blog Archive » Biblical Studies Carnival XXVI

Made Thursday, 31 of January , 2008 at 7:02 pm

[...] Heard (one and two), Airton José da Silva, bzephyr, Tim Bulkeley, Charles Halton (intent and accomplishment), Kevin Wilson, Rick Brannan, Claude Mariottini, and likely some others who’ve slipped [...]

Comment by Chris

Made Saturday, 18 of October , 2008 at 9:01 am

Thanks for the review. I was thinking about using his book as the text for a Master level course. Is there a better one?
Cristian

Comment by Chris

Made Saturday, 18 of October , 2008 at 9:03 am

Thanks for the review. I have been thinking about using this is a introductory textbook. Would Sivan be better??
Cristian

Comment by Charles Halton

Made Saturday, 18 of October , 2008 at 4:50 pm

Cristian,
I would probably use the Schniedewind/Hunt Grammar for a Master’s level course–I’m not a big fan of Sivan’s grammar, but it is in English. Dennis Pardee’s grammar is nice if your students know French (Eisenbrauns is coming out with an English translation sometime soon) and Tropper’s grammar is good for reference if your students know German (however, his treatments are sometimes uneven in my opinion, particularly his enclitic mem stuff). At the end of the day I think the combo of pedagogical usefulness and English grammar make the Schniedewind/Hunt grammar my number one choice.

Leave a comment

About this site

Bible and ancient Near East: teaching + research / causing reflection / moving the field forward