By Charles Halton on Thursday, 20 December 2007 at 8:11 pm

I read an interview with the head editor of the Holman Christian Standard Bible and he had this to say:

Here’s an interesting one. You’ll find that very few translations have this correct. ESV, NIV, a lot of them use the expression “strong drink.” Most people think “strong drink” is whiskey or rum or gin or something like that, but distillation was not discovered until the 9th century ad. So our translation correctly translates it “beer.”

It’s about time!  I’m pretty tired of reading “strong drink” in translations since we have known for a long time that shekar is beer, plain and simple.  We don’t know a lot about how beer was made from ancient Hebrew sources, but we know quite a bit about it from Akkadian.  If you’re interested in this topic here’s where to find all you want to know about shikaru:

  • L.F. Hartman and A.L. Oppenheim, On Beer and Brewing Techniques in Ancient Mesopotamia (Baltimore 1950) (= JAOS Suppl. 10).
  • W. Röllig, Das Bier im alten Mesopotamien (Berlin 1970).


Comments (12)

Category: Akkadian Language,All,Fun Quotes

12 Comments

Comment by Will

Made Thursday, 20 of December , 2007 at 9:21 pm

Charles, with your background, I’m thrilled to hear you say that the HCSB “gets it right!” One of the things I noticed right away about the HCSB was its willingness to use the words we use, like “beer” instead of the awkward “strong drink.” I’ve got to say just browsing around your blog, I’ve found your studies, your work and your blogging fascinating. I look forward to reading more.

Will

Comment by Charles Halton

Made Thursday, 20 of December , 2007 at 10:20 pm

Thanks for your great interview!

Comment by jake

Made Thursday, 20 of December , 2007 at 10:33 pm

Charles:

Unless someone is drinking a Sam Adams Utopia (54 proof), no beer that I know of would even qualify as “strong drink.”

Thanks, too, for the card. It made my day after coming from some grueling finals.

Comment by Chris

Made Friday, 21 of December , 2007 at 1:01 am

Amen, Charles.

Jake — Now that I have lost my tolerance, practically anything Belgian qualifies, as does Trois Pistoles and its Canadian ilk.

Comment by Angela Erisman

Made Friday, 21 of December , 2007 at 12:45 pm

Some beers are actually fairly high in alcohol (higher than Sam Adams, though not approaching distillates). Whether beer in antiquity was particularly strong would depend on the alcohol content. Do we have any way of knowing what that was?

Also, beer is technically made from grain. There is also mead, which is “beer” made from honey. I’m not certain whether there is a separate word for this in Hebrew or Akkadian.

Another good resource on drink in antiquity is “Drink and be Merry,” an exhibition catalogue from the Israel Museum. Although it deals mostly with classical periods.

Comment by d LU.shi-ka-ri-i

Made Friday, 21 of December , 2007 at 4:39 pm

“Some beers are actually fairly high in alcohol (higher than Sam Adams, though not approaching distillates).”

I’m not sure if this was in reference to my statement about Sam Adams Utopia. If so, what beer is stronger? I’ve always heard that the Utopia was the strongest commercial beer.

http://www.timesreporter.com/index.php?ID=74950

PS. I have a bottle.

Comment by James Pate

Made Friday, 21 of December , 2007 at 9:33 pm

I once had this beer called Old English Ale, or something like that. It was thick and strong. I didn’t care for it that much.

Comment by Angela Erisman

Made Friday, 21 of December , 2007 at 9:55 pm

Ooops. Read too fast and didn’t see that you were talking about the Utopia. I was thinking of some Belgian ales, but they don’t come close to 54 proof.

P.S. What’re ya saving it for?

Comment by Chris

Made Friday, 21 of December , 2007 at 11:49 pm

Angela —

Was it, perhaps, “a land flowing with milk and *mead*”?

Comment by d LU.shi-ka-ri-i

Made Saturday, 22 of December , 2007 at 5:14 pm

My brother-in-law when he visits in a few days. I also had to wait for a special Riedel glass in the mail. It looks like a scotch glass. My family includes some pretty serious foodies. My wife regularly gets to drink Petrus, Latour, Conti, D’yquem as a budding sommelier, and her parents have the unfortunate habit of taking us to 5-star (Mobile) restaurants (e.g. French Laundry, Per Se, Le Bec Fin, Inn at Little Washington, etc.). We should have a merry Christmas.

Comment by Charles Halton

Made Saturday, 22 of December , 2007 at 5:42 pm

I hope you weren’t one of the many who vomit at Per Se.

“More people vomit in Per Se than in `your average college bar,’ according to Phoebe Damrosch. She waited tables at the three-starred Michelin venue”

For the story:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aGpMr9s01q4k

Comment by d LU.shi-ka-ri-i

Made Saturday, 22 of December , 2007 at 6:08 pm

I know about the book and I don’t think this is at all accurate. In fact, a previous captain at my wife’s restaurant went onto work at Per Se, and via a mutual friend, that claim was nothing more than nonsense. My wife works at a restaurant with a similarly sized menu and never sees that happen, nor did I see it happen at Per Se.

Leave a comment

About this site

Bible and ancient Near East: teaching + research / causing reflection / moving the field forward