The world needs good writing. Whether we write emails to a love interest, status updates on Facebook, fictional essays, scholarly articles, or non-fiction books, we could benefit others by writing better. Here is a list of books that I’ve put together to help you do just that. It’s not a bare list; I’ve added a few thoughts and musings along the way. Feel free to add your own recommendations in the comments section below. Happy writing.
If you consult only one book to improve your writing, Several short sentences about writing by Verlyn Klinkenborg should be it. This book is not your typical “how-to-write” book filled with grammar and style discussions. It is a series of profound short sentences that will turn upside down your views of writing. You don’t read this book; you meditate on it. And you’ll be a better writer because of it.
If you can’t write a sentence then you can’t write. Sentences are foundational to writing, this is obvious. However, how much thought do you put into their construction? Many of us who are engaged in academic writing put a lot of time into structuring a book proposal or outlining a journal article but then spend relatively little time composing actual sentences. And then killing off half of them. And retooling the survivors. But this is what it takes to produce good writing. Stanley Fish’s How to Write a Sentence: And How to Read One is a fantastic guide that will help you deconstruct every element of the sentences you read and then expertly fashion your own.
Academic writers can learn a lot about the craft of writing from authors of fiction. Novelists spend their entire day forging prose while academics try to cram writing sessions in between teaching, grading, and administrative duties. And, if a novelist is a crappy writer odds are they won’t eat. This weeds out most of the hacks and those left standing generally know how to write an engaging string of words. Ann Patchett’s The Getaway Car is a reflection on her literary life. It includes inspiring personal stories as well as nitty gritty advice on how to plant your tail into a chair for hours at a time and smith some words. Plus, it’s a short read which is always nice.
Some will be put off by Stephen King’s “colorful” writing in On Writing, but it is a fantastic book. King does not approach the act of writing as a detached observer. Instead, he tells you his own story of how he became a writer. Like Patchett he gives plenty of very practical tips on how to think up new ideas (take frequent walks) and how to cultivate the self-discipline it takes to write (pick a consistent time and place in which to write and only write).
Lastly, and most importantly, to be a good writer you must be a good reader. You need to nourish your literary sensibilities with a steady diet of good writing. Especially if you are an academic writer. Let’s be honest, shall we? Most academic writing is terrible. It’s difficult to follow, hard to understand, and a bore to read. If this is all you read then don’t be surprised if you’re a crappy writer. Supplement your diet with fantastic writing–fiction or non-fiction or both, just make sure it’s good. You can drop by your local bookstore and ask for recommendations or consult various lists of writing that others have judged as good such as the Booker or the Pulitzer prizes. Good examples of well written scholarly monographs can be hard to find. But–and I know she will be embarrassed by this–I think an outstanding example of a well crafted book, from start to finish, is Angela Roskop’s The Wilderness Itineraries. It’s tough subject matter (try making biblical lists interesting to a modern audience!) but this book is clear, concise, and even engaging. Study it and then go and do likewise.
My experience with advice on writing is much like that with getting calls from unlisted or unknown numbers – it makes me want to check whether my wallet is still there. Granted, this is probably the fault of the abysmal Strunk and White and their acolytes, but sadly, some of the examples you give aren’t any better. Consider Fish’s “How to Write a Sentence” which I picked up on a recommendation from a knowledgeable friend (and against the one-star reviews on Amazon). In the very introduction, I found a quote by Anthony Burgess about words sliding into slots ordained by syntax to which Fish added:
“Before the words slide into their slots, they are just discrete items, pointing everywhere and nowhere.” I was immediately reminded of that Dashiell Hammett quote “I was trying to count how many lies could be found in those nine words, and had reached four, with promise of more….” Except, of course, in Fish’s case, it’s not lies, it’s BS, of the Chomskyan sort. And it gets worse from there, like in chapter 2 where Fish actually praises Strunk and White and apparently considers them the pinnacle of what he calls “teaching of formal grammar”. Goodness.
As for “to be a good writer you must be a good reader”, I cannot agree more, though I do feel the need to point out that the jump from “being to a good reader” to “reading good writing” is quite a long one and worthy of a separate discussion. But nevermind that because what I would like to know is what makes good writing. You point us in one direction – “writing that others have judged as good” – to which I reply with B.R.Myers’ Reader Manifesto and his opinion of those others and their judgment. But even Myers’ criticism of the vapid descriptions of good writing so typical of prize committees (valid as it is) resorts at times to the same meaningless characterizations – just what the hell is “careful and restrained writing”? So my original question still stands, what is good writing and how do I recognize it?
Herr Nachtigall, your remarks resonate with me. I can’t say I’ve read any of these books listed, but I’m probably closest to reading King’s. I’ve wanted to thumb through Virginia Tufte’s (no relation to Edward, I assume, is there?) Artful Sentences but I’ve not found the opportunity yet. Also, books about writing well and books that themselves exemplify it may allow us the opportunity to discuss good writing (and good reading), but my own experience has yet to confirm that spending time with said books has a lot of effect on their reader’s writing. I wish it were otherwise!
As for what good writing is, I’m sure the judgement is at least partly subjective, but we can probably with good reason use Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it”. For my part, the things that I consider good writing are those passages that beckon my rereading of them, that are full of fun words, that may require a little more concentration than typically pedestrian prose, but that reward that concentration with an almost unlooked-for smile. And Charles, as I already said to you, variation and a palpable rhythm.
You all make good points. I think these books have value even if it is only to provide some examples of good writing and to help us consciously think about improving our skills.
As for good writing, I think I agree with Adam, particularly his point about good writing continues to be reward the reader upon rereading. But, there is certainly a subjective element to this.