Since this blog is on teaching and research I would be remiss to ignore the recent controversy surrounding the resignation of Lawrence Summers, the President of Harvard University. As an outside observer, it seems to me that Summers’ proposed initiatives were sensible and rational. Harvard must change the way it operates or it risks tarnishing its reputation even futher than it already is. Certain schools, notably the professional schools, are run very well and they seem to embrace change more amicably than the entrenched (can you say “tenure” see my previous post on this issue) Arts and Sciences school. Universities–every university and educational outlet–must always re-evaluate how they deliver education to the people they serve. Educational outlets must constantly change, even if they are micro-changes, in order to most effectively deliver education in this world of lighting fast communication and disruptive innovations. For the most part, the tenured faculty of Harvard’s Arts and Sciences department do not seem to understand this.
Furthermore, these faculty members are not faithful to the open-mindedness that they espouse. To merely mention the fact that genetic differences between genders should be further researched is a natural course of someone who embraces a commitment to open-mindedness. There may be zero correlation between genetic components and the ablility or desire to participate in certain disciplines, but a liberal society should pursues such questions open-mindedly. At one time I thought about studying at Harvard but my Dad wisely told me that Harvard was more hype than substance and that the education was not worth the money–all of the top tier schools are about the same and it is very hard to differentiate between the quality of their undergraduate programs (to be sure, graduate programs vary widely and I am exempting Harvard’s professional schools–minus the Divinity school–from my cost benefit analysis, their professional schools are worth the money but for reasons other than just the quality of their education).
If American universities do not embrace a consistent open-mindedness and a willingness and ability to change and innovate, then the golden age of these universitites has past and newer universities like Olin College and Babson College will leave Harvard in the dust. I would much rather go to either of these schools than Harvard. They get it, Harvard doesn’t. Olin and Babson care about giving their students the ability to achieve their dreams while many professors at Harvard are only concerned about themselves and preserving their perks and their narrow-minded and imperial view of the modern university.
But, don’t take my word for it. Here are two articles worth reading. One is from the National Organization for Women shortly after Summers’ infamous statement. The other article is from The Times. Read them both, then tell me what you think.



